Why Tech Stocks Plunged This Week Despite Nvidia's Strong Earnings

Tech stocks tumbled this week even as Nvidia crushed earnings expectations with $57B revenue, signaling investors are questioning whether AI valuations have run too far.

Stock market concept with downward trending red lines in abstract modern style

What Happened

Tech stocks experienced a sharp selloff this week despite Nvidia delivering blowout Q3 earnings on November 19th. The paradox captured Wall Street’s attention: Nvidia reported $57 billion in revenue (beating estimates), profit of $31.9 billion (up 65% year-over-year), and 62% growth—yet the stock fell, dragging the broader tech sector down with it.

The Magnificent Seven (Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Tesla, Nvidia) collectively lost over $500 billion in market value in the three trading days following Nvidia’s earnings. Other AI-adjacent stocks like AMD, Oracle, and Snowflake also declined sharply despite strong fundamentals.

Investors are asking: if the best earnings in tech history aren’t enough to satisfy markets, what does that say about valuations?

Key Details

  • Nvidia Q3 Results: $57B revenue (beat), 62% growth YoY, $31.9B profit (up 65%)
  • Nvidia Stock Reaction: Down 3.5% post-earnings, down 7% week-to-date
  • Magnificent Seven: Lost ~$500B market cap (November 19-22)
  • AI Stock Selloff: AMD -8%, Oracle -6%, Snowflake -9%, Palantir -12%
  • Tech Sector: Nasdaq down 4.2% for the week
  • Rotation: Money flowing to utilities, industrials, consumer staples

Why It Matters

What Sparked the Selloff

Valuation concerns hitting critical mass:

Even after this week’s declines, Nvidia trades at:

  • Forward P/E: ~35x (high for a hardware company)
  • Price-to-Sales: ~18x (extreme by historical standards)
  • Market Cap: $1.4 trillion (requires sustained growth to justify)

The question investors are asking: what happens when growth slows from 62% to “only” 30-40%? At these multiples, even strong growth might not be enough.

AI spending skepticism:

  • Companies have spent over $200 billion on AI infrastructure in 2024-2025
  • Revenue from AI applications remains unclear for most buyers
  • CFOs are beginning to question ROI
  • If spending slows, Nvidia and AI stocks face harsh reset

Technical factors:

  • Many institutional investors took profits after 200%+ runs
  • Tax-loss harvesting into year-end
  • Portfolio rebalancing away from tech overweights

The Magnificent Seven Problem

The “Magnificent Seven” tech giants now represent over 30% of the S&P 500’s total market capitalization. This concentration creates risks:

If tech sells off:

  • Entire market falls (index funds forced to buy/sell based on weight)
  • Diversification doesn’t help (tech dominates everything)
  • Correction in tech becomes correction in broad market

Performance divergence:

Year-to-date (through November 22, 2025):

  • Magnificent Seven: +42% average
  • S&P 500 ex-Mag Seven: +11%
  • Small cap (Russell 2000): +8%

This divergence is historically extreme. Either the Magnificent Seven justify valuations through continued growth, or they revert to market means (painful correction).

What Investors Are Thinking

The bull case (increasingly questioned):

  • AI infrastructure spending continues for years
  • Applications emerge that justify infrastructure investment
  • Nvidia maintains 70%+ market share in AI chips
  • 40-50% growth sustains for 3-5 more years

The bear case (gaining traction):

  • AI spending plateaus as ROI fails to materialize
  • Competition (AMD, custom chips) erodes Nvidia margins
  • Growth slows faster than expected
  • Valuations contract even if business remains strong

The selloff suggests more investors are shifting from bull to bear—or at least taking profits after extraordinary runs.

Broader Market Implications

Sector Rotation Underway

Money is moving from high-valuation tech to:

Defensive sectors:

  • Utilities: +3.2% this week (people need electricity regardless of economy)
  • Consumer Staples: +1.8% (recession-resistant)
  • Healthcare: +1.2% (defensive characteristics)

Value stocks:

  • Financials: +2.1% (benefit from sustained higher rates)
  • Industrials: +1.5% (infrastructure spending)

This rotation pattern often signals investors expect:

  • Economic slowdown
  • End of tech outperformance
  • Higher volatility ahead

Fed Policy Complication

The tech selloff complicates the Federal Reserve’s calculus:

Before selloff:

  • Strong economy + hot AI sector = Fed could keep rates higher longer
  • Tech wealth effect supporting consumer spending

After selloff:

  • Market volatility might force Fed caution
  • Negative wealth effect if tech rout continues
  • But: AI boom hasn’t spread to broad economy anyway

Most analysts expect Fed to hold rates steady but monitor tech sector closely. A major tech rout could force rate cuts to prevent broader contagion.

What’s Different This Time

This isn’t the first tech selloff, but several factors make it notable:

Compared to dot-com bubble (2000):

  • Similar: Extreme valuations based on future promises
  • Different: Today’s tech companies have massive profits (not losses)
  • Similar: Concentration risk in small number of stocks
  • Different: AI has real applications (dot-com had more vapor)

Compared to 2022 selloff:

  • Similar: Rising rates pressured valuations
  • Different: Rates aren’t rising now, selloff is valuation-driven
  • Similar: Unprofitable tech hit hardest
  • Different: This time profitable giants are selling off too

The unique aspect: companies can deliver perfect earnings and still sell off because valuations already priced in perfection.

Expert Reactions

Jim Chanos (short-seller, Kynikos Associates):

“We’ve seen this movie before. When the best possible news isn’t good enough to justify valuations, the market is telling you something. AI will be transformative, but that doesn’t mean today’s stock prices make sense.”

Cathie Wood (ARK Invest) remains optimistic:

“Short-term volatility is noise. AI is the most important technology platform shift since the internet. These companies will be worth multiples of today’s valuations in five years.”

JPMorgan strategists noted in client memo:

“The Magnificent Seven trade is overcrowded. When everyone is on the same side of the boat, even minor issues cause rushes for the exit. We’re seeing positioning reset, not fundamental change.”

What To Watch Next

Key Indicators for Tech Stock Direction:

Week of Nov 25-29 (Thanksgiving week):

  • Thin trading volumes (many traders off)
  • Potential for volatility on low volume
  • Black Friday retail data (consumer health indicator)

December:

  • Q4 earnings guidance from tech leaders
  • Any signs of AI spending slowdown
  • Tax-loss selling may accelerate tech declines

Q1 2026:

  • Actual Q4 results (did guidance prove accurate?)
  • Signs of AI application revenue (justifies infrastructure spend?)
  • Fed policy updates

Scenarios for 2026:

Bull scenario (30% probability):

  • AI applications emerge that drive revenue
  • Spending sustains, Nvidia growth continues 40%+
  • Tech stocks recover and make new highs
  • S&P 500 +15-20%

Muddle scenario (50% probability):

  • Tech stocks trade sideways to slightly down
  • Earnings grow but multiples compress
  • Rotation to other sectors continues
  • S&P 500 +5-10% (driven by non-tech)

Bear scenario (20% probability):

  • AI spending cuts trigger sharp tech selloff
  • Magnificent Seven down 20-30%
  • Broader market down 10-15%
  • Recession concerns mount

Our Take

The tech selloff this week—with Nvidia down despite crushing earnings—is the market’s way of saying “valuations matter, even for great companies.”

Here’s the uncomfortable truth both bulls and bears need to accept:

Bulls are right that:

  • AI is transformative
  • These companies have real profits
  • Growth remains strong by historical standards

Bears are right that:

  • Valuations are extreme
  • Expectations are unrealistic
  • Concentration risk is dangerous

Both can be true. Great companies can be overvalued. The 2000 dot-com crash taught us this: Amazon fell 95% from its peak, yet proved to be one of the best investments of all time if you bought at the bottom, not the 2000 top.

The rotation out of tech doesn’t mean AI is dead or these companies are doomed. It means the easy money has been made, and from here, returns depend on execution, not multiple expansion.

For investors, this is a warning: when perfect isn’t good enough, it’s time to reassess position sizing, take some profits, and prepare for higher volatility. The AI revolution is real, but revolutions don’t move in straight lines.

The Bottom Line

Tech stocks tumbled this week despite Nvidia’s exceptional $57 billion revenue quarter, with the Magnificent Seven losing over $500 billion in market value as investors question whether AI valuations have run too far ahead of fundamentals. The selloff signals a critical shift: even perfect earnings can’t satisfy markets when stocks trade at 35x forward earnings and require sustained 40%+ growth to justify prices.

This isn’t a panic sell-off or a rejection of AI’s potential—it’s a valuation reset. Money is rotating from high-flying tech to defensive sectors (utilities, staples) and value plays (financials, industrials), a pattern that typically precedes either a market slowdown or a broadening of market leadership beyond a narrow group of stocks.

For investors, the message is clear: the era of easy tech returns driven by multiple expansion is over. Future gains will require actual execution and sustained growth, not just AI hype. That doesn’t mean selling everything—but it does mean being realistic about valuations, taking profits when appropriate, and preparing for a more volatile 2026 in tech stocks.


Sources