Link Copied!

Anexión por la Economía: La Estrategia de Groenlandia

La repentina detención de los proyectos eólicos marinos de Nueva York no se trata solo de interferencias de radar. Es un asedio económico calculado diseñado para forzar la mano de Dinamarca en el depósito de tierras raras sin explotar más grande del mundo.

🌐
Nota de Idioma

Este artículo está escrito en inglés. El título y la descripción han sido traducidos automáticamente para su conveniencia.

Una visualización abstracta que conecta un parque eólico marino de los Estados Unidos con fallas y estática con vetas minerales de neón brillantes en Groenlandia, simbolizando la transferencia de valor.

On December 22, 2025, the White House cited “National Security” and “Radar Interference” as the reasons for halting major offshore wind leases off the coast of New York. Within 48 hours, shares of Ørsted, the Danish energy giant, plummeted by nearly 20%.

To the casual observer, this looks like typical domestic energy politics, specifically a fossil-fuel-friendly administration favoring oil over wind. But the geography tells a darker, more strategic story. This maneuver is not about protecting radar at Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule). It is about the island that the base sits on.

The halt of the New York wind projects is an economic siege. It is a modern application of the “Monroe Doctrine” on steroids, designed to crush the Danish economy until Copenhagen agrees to open the vault that Washington actually wants: The Kvanefjeld rare earth mine in Greenland.

The Venezuelan Playbook

To understand the strategy in the Arctic, observers must look at the Caribbean. The United States policy toward Venezuela for the last decade has focused on control rather than purely democracy. When the American energy grid relies on imports, sanctions loosen. When the goal is regime compliance, blockades tighten.

The logic follows a doctrine of Resource Realism.

Denmark is now facing a specialized version of this playbook. The nation relies heavily on its “Green Energy Export” model. Ørsted is not just a company; it functions as a pillar of the Danish welfare state, largely owned by the Danish government. By freezing Ørsted’s projects in the most lucrative market (the United States East Coast), the White House is effectively sanctioning a NATO ally.

Why? Because Denmark holds the keys to the one resource Washington desperately lacks: Heavy Rare Earth Elements (HREEs).

The Prize: Kvanefjeld

While media outlets focus on wind turbines, the real map is geological. Greenland hosts the Kvanefjeld deposit, widely considered the world’s largest undeveloped reserve of rare earth elements.

The Math of Independence

If Washington intends to decouple from the Chinese supply chain, it needs Greenland. The numbers highlight the scale of the prize:

Kvanefjeld Reserves11.1 Million Tonnes (TREO)\text{Kvanefjeld Reserves} \approx 11.1 \text{ Million Tonnes (TREO)} Uranium Content593 Million lbs (U3O8)\text{Uranium Content} \approx 593 \text{ Million lbs (U}_3\text{O}_8\text{)}

China currently controls over 80% of the global processing for these minerals. Kvanefjeld alone could break that monopoly. But a major hurdle remains: The Danish and Greenlandic governments blocked it. In 2021, Greenland passed legislation effectively banning uranium mining (which is co-mingled with the rare earths here), stalling the project indefinitely.

For a “Resource Realist” administration, this refusal from a dependent ally is unacceptable. The Kvanefjeld site contains critical amounts of Neodymium and Praseodymium. These are metals essential for permanent magnets used in F-35 fighter jets, Virginia-class submarines, and ironically, the very wind turbines the United States is currently blocking.

The 2019 Warning Shot

This strategy did not emerge in a vacuum. In August 2019, Donald Trump reportedly discussed the idea of “buying Greenland.” The reaction was global ridicule. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen called the idea “absurd,” and the diplomatic fallout was swift.

However, the 2019 offer was likely a testing of the waters, a clumsy first attempt at acquisition. The 2025 strategy is more refined. Instead of a direct purchase offer, the administration is using economic coercion. By targeting Denmark’s crown jewel industry, the United States creates a pain point that cannot be dismissed as easily as a tweet. The message is clear: If Denmark wants to sell wind power to America, it must sell rare earths to America.

The Valuation Crush

The “Radar Interference” claim serves as the lever. The financial damage inflicted on Denmark aims to force a policy change.

When the pause was announced, the market reacted instantly. Ørsted lost billions in market cap. For a country with a GDP of roughly 400 billion dollars, a 20% hit to its national champion constitutes a macroeconomic crisis. Pension funds across Denmark saw their portfolios crater overnight.

This is “Annexation by Economics.” The United States did not need to buy Greenland in 2019. It only needs to make the cost of keeping Greenland’s current policies too high to bear.

  • The Trade: The United States releases the “Radar Hold” on NY Wind.
  • The Cost: Denmark and Greenland issue the mining permits for Kvanefjeld to an American-friendly consortium.

The European Paralysis

Europe finds itself paralyzed in this confrontation. While the European Union traditionally defends its member states against trade aggression, Brussels is currently dependent on American Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) to replace Russian pipeline supplies. This dependency creates a diplomatic silence. The EU cannot afford to antagonize the White House over a “radar dispute” when winter energy security is at stake.

Furthermore, the European defense industry is quietly aligned with the American objective. European defense contractors like BAE Systems and Airbus also struggle with the Chinese chokehold on rare earth minerals. While they publicly support Denmark’s sovereignty, privately, the defense ministries of France and Germany acknowledge that Kvanefjeld must be opened to secure NATO’s supply chain. Denmark is effectively alone, squeezed between an aggressive American ally and a silent European family.

The “Radar Mirage”

Is the radar threat real? Technically, yes. Wind turbines can create “clutter” for coastal early warning radars like the PAVE PAWS system at Cape Cod Space Force Station. The Doppler shift from spinning blades can mimic the signature of slow-moving aircraft or cruise missiles.

fd=2vλcos(θ)f_d = \frac{2v}{\lambda} \cos(\theta)

Where vv is the blade tip speed (often 200 mph+) and λ\lambda is the radar wavelength.

However, this problem was identified, and solved, years ago. The British Air Defence radar network coexists with massive North Sea wind farms using “Infill Radar” and advanced signal processing. The sudden re-emergence of this issue in late 2025 constitutes a pretext, not a barrier.

The Pentagon knows how to filter wind turbines. It does not know how to manufacture Neodymium without China.

(For a detailed analysis of the physics behind the radar claims, see the deep dive: The Radar Mirage: Why Trump Halted NY Offshore Wind.)

The Strategic Extension

Jeff Landry and other Gulf Coast politicians have long viewed the energy sector through a lens of raw power. Under this framework, Greenland is not seen as a sovereign territory of an ally, but as a “Strategic Extension” of North American resource security. It is effectively treated as a 10th Canadian province or a 51st state in all but name.

The concept of a “Strategic Extension” bypasses the messiness of formal annexation. The United States does not need to pay for Greenland’s healthcare or schools; it only needs to control the mineral rights. By creating a crisis in the wind sector, the administration forces Copenhagen to decide what matters more: The sanctity of a uranium ban, or the solvency of its energy sector.

This maneuver allows the administration to kill two birds with one stone. First, it halts the expansion of offshore wind, an industry the White House has ideologically opposed in favor of fossil fuels. Second, it leverages that halt to secure the strategic minerals required for American military dominance. It is a cynical, yet efficient, alignment of domestic grievance politics and imperialist foreign policy.

Forward Outlook: The Permit Standoff

The industry is witnessing a shift where “Green Energy” is no longer treated as a climate goal, but as a geopolitical hostage. Renewable permits have become currency.

Expect the pressure on Ørsted to intensify. The “Radar Studies” will likely drag on exactly as long as the Greenland parliament refuses to issue mining permits. The moment the Kvanefjeld mine is greenlit, the radar interference will miraculously vanish.

Investors should watch the Copenhagen Stock Exchange closely. A sudden recovery in Ørsted stock will likely coincide not with a radar breakthrough, but with a mining permit announcement in Nuuk. The two are now inextricably linked by the invisible tether of United States foreign policy.

Sources

🦋 Discussion on Bluesky

Discuss on Bluesky

Searching for posts...