Link Copied!

Subventionsparadox: Wie 'freie Märkte' Tesla ein Monopol bescherten

Die Aufhebung der bundesweiten Subventionen für Elektrofahrzeuge sollte das 'woke' Elektroauto abtöten. Stattdessen tötete sie den Wettbewerb. Im vierten Quartal 2025 stieg Teslas Marktanteil auf 59 % und bewies, dass Deregulierung die ultimative Waffe für ein reifes Monopol ist.

🌐
Sprachhinweis

Dieser Artikel ist auf Englisch verfasst. Titel und Beschreibung wurden für Ihre Bequemlichkeit automatisch übersetzt.

Ein futuristischer Tesla, der in einem Scheinwerfer glänzt, während Silhouetten älterer Autos in den Schatten verschwinden

The Argument in Brief

The political narrative of 2025 was simple: killing the federal EV tax credit would stop the government from “picking winners and losers.” The reality of 2026 is brutally ironic. By removing the $7,500 lifeline that Ford, GM, and Rivian depended on, the “free market” policy didn’t kill the electric car. It simply handed the keys to the only company that didn’t need the money. The repeal of the 30D tax credit was, inadvertently, the greatest gift the anti-EV lobby ever gave to Elon Musk.

The Conventional Wisdom

If you listen to the victory laps on cable news or the panicked op-eds in Detroit papers, the story is that the EV revolution is “dead.” The logic goes like this: The government artificially propped up demand; now that the prop is gone, the market will collapse, and consumers will return to buying gas-guzzling Silverados. To the mainstream, the Q4 2025 sales crash—where total EV sales dropped 46%—is proof that without a handout, nobody wants a battery on wheels.

Why The Consensus Is Wrong

This “death of EVs” narrative misses the single most important data point in the Q4 report. Yes, the market shrank. But Tesla’s share of that market exploded.

In Q3 2025, with subsidies still in place, Tesla held a respectable but declining 41% of the US EV market. In Q4 2025, after the credits vanished, that number didn’t drop. It surged to 59%.

The industry is not witnessing the death of the electric vehicle. It is witnessing the Detroit Capitulation. The subsidy wasn’t a “bonus” for Tesla. It was life support for everyone else. When proponents pull the plug, the healthy patient walks out of the hospital, and the sick ones flatline.

Point 1: The Volume Moat is Real

The fundamental misunderstanding here is about manufacturing physics, not politics. Building EVs is a volume game. Tesla produced 1.64 million cars globally in 2025. Ford sold just over 84,000 EVs in the US.

When you make a million of something, your cost per unit drops to a level that a competitor making 80,000 simply cannot match. For years, the $7,500 tax credit masked this inefficiency. It allowed Ford to sell a Mustang Mach-E at a loss and still (barely) move metal. Without that $7,500, Ford has to either raise prices (killing demand) or eat massive losses (killing the stock price). They chose neither. They chose to quit.

Point 2: The “Write-Down” Wave

The numbers don’t lie. In Q4 2025 alone, the legacy auto industry took a combined $26 billion in write-downs on their EV divisions.

  • Ford ($20B): Officially abandoned its large three-row EV SUV program in December.
  • GM ($6B): Scaled back its Ultium expectations yet again.

These aren’t just “bad quarters.” These are strategic retreats. They are admitting that without government help, they cannot compete with Tesla’s cost structure.

Point 3: The Consumer Flight to Safety

Put yourself in the shoes of a buyer in January 2026. You want an EV. You see Ford cutting production, Rivian bleeding cash, and GM cancelling models. Then you see Tesla, profitable and scaling. Who do you buy from?

The removal of subsidies removed the safety net for buyers, too. Nobody wants to buy a “stranded asset,” a car from a brand that might exit the segment in two years. The legislative chaos drove buyers into the arms of the only “safe” option.

The Evidence

The data from Cox Automotive and Business Insider is unambiguous. The market didn’t just contract. It consolidated.

The Market Share Shift:

  • Q3 2025 (With Subsidy): Tesla ~41% share.
  • Q4 2025 (No Subsidy): Tesla 59% share.

The Survivor List: While Tesla grabbed nearly 60% of the pie, the scraps were fought over by everyone else:

  • GM: ~10% (The only other double-digit player).
  • Ford: 6%.
  • Rivian: 4%.

The Policy timeline: The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) explicitly terminated the 30D New Clean Vehicle Credit for any vehicle acquired after September 30, 2025. This date is the exact inflection point where the market bifurcated into “Tesla” and “Everyone Else.”

The Counterarguments

”But Tesla’s sales volume dropped year-over-year.”

The Reality: True. Tesla delivering 589,000 cars in the US (down slightly) is not growth. But in a crashing market, flat is the new up. Maintaining volume while your competitors lose 50-80% of their sales is how you build a monopoly. Tesla didn’t need to grow to win; they just needed to not die.

”Hybrids are the real winner.”

The Reality: This is the fallback position for Detroit. Ford and Toyota are seeing massive hybrid growth. But a hybrid is a gas car with a hobby. It doesn’t solve the long-term autonomy or energy density problem. By pivoting to hybrids, US automakers are ceding the entire future platform of software-defined transport to Tesla. They are winning the battle for 2026 sales while losing the war for 2030 robotaxis.

”Rivian’s R2 will save competition.”

The Reality: The R2 design is compelling. But Rivian is still losing money on every vehicle. Without the $7,500 credit to lure buyers to a newer brand, Rivian has to achieve Tesla-level manufacturing efficiency purely on merit. That is an incredibly steep hill to climb with a $20 billion hole in the industry’s balance sheet.

A Real-World Example

Look at the Ford F-150 Lightning vs. the Cybertruck. In 2024, with the credit, a base Lightning was price-competitive with a Cybertruck. The Lightning looked like a “normal truck” and appealed to contractors.

In January 2026, without the credit, the math breaks. The Lightning, despite being a capable truck, is seeing sales implode (down 60% in Q4) as Ford winds down production. The Cybertruck, meanwhile, despite a higher price tag (~$80,000), is now outselling the Lightning globally simply because Tesla can actually afford to build it at volume. The “quintessential American truck” didn’t lose on features; it lost on margin.

What This Really Means

The “Subsidy Paradox” teaches a harsh lesson about industrial policy. Technocrats believed they were “nurturing an ecosystem.” In reality, they were keeping zombies alive. By cutting the cord, the government didn’t restore a free market; they revealed that the market had already been conquered.

For Consumers

The “Golden Age” of cheap EV leases is over. If you want an EV in 2026, you are likely buying a Tesla, and you are paying the market rate. The illusion of choice, with dozens of models from dozens of brands, will evaporate as dealers stop stocking the cars that don’t sell.

For Companies

The message to startups is chilling. If you didn’t reach scale by September 30, 2025, you missed the boat. The capital markets are closed to “Tesla Killers” that rely on tax credits to be gross-margin positive.

For the Industry

Expect a wave of bankruptcies and mergers. Only the Chinese OEMs (if tariffs ever lift) or a consolidated “Ford-GM-Chrysler” EV alliance can theoretically challenge Tesla now.

The Bigger Picture

This is a replay of the dot-com crash or the early days of the auto industry. Hundreds of car companies existed in 1910. By 1930, there were three. Subsidies paused that consolidation clock. The OBBBA restarted it. Observers are watching the formation of the Standard Oil of Electricity.

The Path Forward

  1. The Hybrid Bridge: Expect Ford and GM to marketing PHEVs (Plug-in Hybrids) aggressively to meet EPA standards without losing their shirts.
  2. The Regulatory Siege: With a monopoly comes scrutiny. Expect the same “Right” that handed Tesla this win to turn around and launch antitrust investigations by 2027.
  3. The Chinese Wildcard: If Tesla is the only functional US EV maker, the pressure to allow BYD or Xiaomi into the US to “create competition” will become politically bipartisan.

The Uncomfortable Truth

The American Left spent a decade trying to build an EV industry that wasn’t Elon Musk. They subsidized unions, legacy brands, and startups. And the American Right, in a single legislative stroke, wiped all of that effort away, leaving Musk as the last man standing. It turns out you can’t legislate competence, and you can’t tax-credit your way out of a manufacturing deficit.

Final Thoughts

Advocates wanted a free market. They got one. It just so happens that in a free market, the most efficient predator eats everyone else. Welcome to the Monopol-E-V era.

Sources

🦋 Discussion on Bluesky

Discuss on Bluesky

Searching for posts...