If you live in the United States, you could be forgiven for thinking the electric vehicle revolution is over. Dealership lots are overflowing, Ford and GM are pivoting back to hybrids, and the political rhetoric suggests the “EV mandate” has been defeated. But if you look almost anywhere else on Earth, a very different reality emerges.
In Q4 2025, a historic divergence occurred. Data from JD Power and GlobalData reveals that significantly fewer Americans bought electric vehicles, with sales crashing 37% year-over-year following the September 30 expiration of federal tax credits. But globally, the market didn’t just survive; it accelerated. Global EV sales grew 32%, driven by a Chinese market where electric vehicles now account for 50% of all new car sales.
The industry is not dying. It is bifurcating. One market, the “Isolation Island” of the U.S., is decoupling technologically and economically from the rest of the world. While the global standard shifts toward cheap, high-tech electrification, American buyers now face a unique set of artificial constraints that make 2026 look increasingly like 2010.
The September Cliff: Anatomy of a Crash
The catalyst for the American downturn was precise. On September 30, 2025, the provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act that provided up to $7,500 in point-of-sale tax credits expired. This mechanism had effectively served as a bridge for automakers, subsidizing the high cost of domestic battery production while supply chains scrambled to scale.
The market reaction proceeded exactly as economic theory would predict. Q3 2025 witnessed a “Sugar High,” a frantic period where buyers rushed to lock in credits before the midnight deadline. Sales spiked 20% to record highs as inventory cleared. But on October 1, the hangover began. By December, EV market share in the U.S. had fallen to 6.2%, down from a peak of over 10%.
This volatility is fatal for manufacturing efficiency. A gigafactory requires steady, predictable throughput to amortize its billions in capital expenditure. When demand oscillates wildly due to policy whiplash, unit economics collapse. As noted in the analysis of Rivian’s production cuts, even the most promising startups are forced to throttle output. This creates a death spiral: lower volume leads to higher unit costs, which leads to higher prices, which further depresses volume.
The 44% Premium: The Economics of Isolation
The narrative that “EVs are too expensive” is factually correct, but only for North American buyers. This cost barrier is an engineered inefficiency rather than a technological limitation.
According to BloombergNEF’s December 2025 Battery Price Survey, the average price of a lithium-ion battery pack globally fell to $108/kWh. However, the regional spread has widened into a massive chasm:
- China: $84/kWh
- North America: $121/kWh
American consumers are paying a 44% premium for the exact same technology.
Protectionism drives this disparity. The 100% tariffs on Chinese EVs and the strict exclusions of Chinese battery components mean U.S. automakers cannot access the global supply chain’s efficiency. They are forced to source from a domestic supply chain that is still roughly five years behind in scale and optimization.
The Chemistry Gap: LFP vs. NMC
The cost difference isn’t just about labor or subsidies. It is about chemistry. China has standardized on Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) batteries. These cells use iron and phosphate (abundant, cheap materials) instead of expensive nickel and cobalt. LFP is heavier, but it is far durable, safer, and critically, much cheaper to produce.
Western automakers, chasing range figures to satisfy American anxiety, committed heavily to Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) chemistries. NMC offers higher energy density but carries a significantly higher bill of materials. China effectively monopolized the intellectual property and supply chain for LFP early on. Now, as the world pivots to the “Good Enough” battery for mass-market cars, the U.S. is left holding the bag on premium, high-cost chemistry.
To understand the impact in absolute terms, consider the math for a standard 75 kWh battery pack (the size of a Tesla Model Y Long Range):
That creates a $2,775 manufacturing cost disadvantage on the battery alone. When factoring in higher labor costs and the loss of the $7,500 consumer subsidy, the effective price gap between a U.S.-market EV and a global-market EV widens to over $10,000. In China, a BYD Seagull (a competent city car with 190 miles of range) retails for under $10,000. In the U.S., the entry price for a functional EV has stubbornly remained above $35,000.
The Hybrid Pivot: A Rational Retreat
Faced with this mathematical reality, U.S. automakers are behaving rationally. If building a profitable EV at $35,000 is impossible due to supply chain constraints, they stop trying.
Ford and GM’s pivot to “Extended Range Electric Vehicles” (EREVs), essentially hybrids with big batteries, is a survival tactic. It allows them to bypass the strict range anxiety of American consumers and reduced battery costs. By downsizing the battery to 20-30 kWh and adding a gas generator, they can cut the most expensive component of the BOM (Bill of Materials) by 60%.
Data from the EY Mobility Consumer Index released on December 15, 2025, confirms this is a retreat rather than a victory. 50% of global consumers now intend to buy an internal combustion engine (ICE) or hybrid vehicle next, up 13 points. This shift isn’t because drivers dislike the electric driving experience; it is because in markets like the U.S., the value proposition has been destroyed.
The Global Reality: China’s “Techno-Economic” Victory
While the U.S. debates the viability of 19th-century fuels, China has moved on to 21st-century dominance. In Q4 2025, China didn’t just sell cars; it exported a technological ecosystem. Chinese OEMs now control significant market share in Southeast Asia, South America, and even Europe, despite EU tariffs.
The difference is structural. China treated batteries like infrastructure, subsidizing the supply chain for a decade until it reached escape velocity. The U.S. treated subsidies as a consumer coupon: easy to give, easy to take away.
Now, China has reached the holy grail of price parity. An ICE vehicle and an EV in China cost roughly the same to buy, but the EV costs 80% less to fuel. In that environment, mandates become irrelevant. The market naturally selects the superior economic option.
The Infrastructure Divergence
The split extends beyond the car itself. While the U.S. struggles with a fragmented charging network and the chaotic transition to the NACS (Tesla) standard, China has rolled out massive, state-standardized charging infrastructure. Their GB/T standard allows for unified, high-speed charging across all brands. Furthermore, the integration of Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) technology is becoming standard in Chinese cities, turning the EV fleet into a massive distributed battery that stabilizes the grid. In the U.S., V2G remains a niche pilot project.
The Long-Term Risk: The Havana Effect
The danger for the U.S. isn’t just fewer electric cars on the road. It is technological obsolescence.
If the rest of the world standardizes on an 800V electric architecture, software-defined vehicles, and V2G integration, the U.S. internal combustion fleet risks becoming a technological backwater. The U.S. risks becoming the “Havana of the 2030s,” keeping vintage gas cars running while the world moves on to a superior energy paradigm.
As discussed in The End of the Tax Credit, the removal of subsidies was intended to let the market decide. It has. The global market chose electric. The American market, fenced in by tariffs and policy reversals, chose gas. But physics and economics rarely respect borders for long. As battery prices continue their march toward $50/kWh globally, the pressure on the U.S. “Isolation Island” will eventually become untenable.
The Bifurcation Verdict
The “EV Slowdown” is a myth. What the data shows is an EV Segmentation.
There is now a “World Market,” where battery prices fall 13% a year and adoption hits 50%. And there is the “U.S. Market,” where prices are stagnant, sales are falling, and the future is being delayed by policy.
For American consumers, 2026 will be the year of the Hybrid. But observers should not mistake this local detour for the global destination. The road ahead remains electric; America is just taking the scenic route.
🦋 Discussion on Bluesky
Discuss on Bluesky