Link Copied!

El Nuevo Wintel: El Monopolio "Gemini" de Apple y Google

La asociación de Apple con Google de $5 mil millones para integrar Gemini en 1.5 mil millones de dispositivos crea un nuevo monopolio 'Wintel', aplastando efectivamente el sueño de la IA de código abierto para dispositivos móviles.

🌐
Nota de Idioma

Este artículo está escrito en inglés. El título y la descripción han sido traducidos automáticamente para su conveniencia.

Una composición dividida que muestra el logotipo de Apple y el logotipo de la G de Google entrelazados como engranajes industriales pesados, proyectando una sombra sobre símbolos de código abierto rotos.

On January 12, 2026, the two most powerful companies in human history decided to stop pretending they were competitors.

The announcement was couched in the usual corporate anaesthetics. Apple and Google released a joint statement confirming a “multi-year cloud partnership” to integrate Google’s Gemini models into Apple Intelligence. The press release spoke of “privacy,” “user experience,” and “innovation.”

Do not be fooled. This is not a partnership. It is a cartel.

By cementing Gemini as the foundation for Siri on 1.5 billion active devices, Apple and Google have effectively recreated the “Wintel” monopoly of the 1990s. The stakes, however, are no longer just software compatibility. The stakes are the fundamental cognitive infrastructure of the next decade.

For the open-source AI movement, which spent 2025 hoping that standardizing on Llama or Mistral could break Big Tech’s grip, this is a fatal blow. The “Open AI” dream didn’t die with a whimper; it died with a $5 billion wire transfer from Cupertino to Mountain View.

The New Wintel: Interface + Intelligence

To understand why this deal is catastrophic for competition, one must look back to the 1990s. The “Wintel” duopoly (Windows + Intel) dominated personal computing because they controlled the two choke points: the Interface (OS) and the Engine (Chip). If a user wanted to build a PC, they paid the tax.

In 2026, the choke points have shifted. The new “Interface” is the Agent: the voice in your ear or the text on your screen that summarizes emails and books flights. The new “Engine” is the Foundation Model: the reasoning capability that powers that agent.

With this deal, Apple secures the Interface (Siri/iOS) and Google secures the Engine (Gemini).

This arrangement solves an existential crisis for both companies. Apple, arguably behind in the raw physics of model training, gets instant access to the world’s most capable efficient-reasoning infrastructure without burning its own cash on Nvidia H200 clusters. Google, terrified of losing search volume to “answer engines” like Perplexity or OpenAI, gets its brain inserted directly into the Neural Engine of every iPhone on Earth.

The result is a closed loop of data and dominance that makes the old Standard Oil trust look like a lemonade stand.

The Open Source Death Spiral

The specific tragedy of this deal lies in its impact on alternatives. Throughout 2025, the “local AI” movement gained massive momentum. The hope was that efficient open-source models (like Meta’s Llama 4 or Mistral’s latest sparse-mixture models) would run locally on devices, freeing users from corporate surveillance.

That future hinged on distribution. An open-source model is useless if it cannot run deeply integrated within the OS.

By defaulting to Gemini, Apple has relegated open source to a second-class citizen. While a user can technically install a Llama-based app on their iPhone, it will not have system-level access. It cannot inherently read the Calendar database or summarize iMessage threads as they arrive. It cannot wake up when the user says “Siri.”

The “Apple Foundation Models” (AFM) powered by Gemini will hold the keys to the castle. Everything else is just an app, sandboxed and blinded. For developers, the message is clear: if you want to build for the next generation of mobile computing, you build for Gemini. The incentives to optimize for Llama evaporate instantly.

The Engineer’s Catch-22

Software creators building for the App Store are trapped. Prior to this deal, the industry focused on optimizing small language models (SLMs) to run locally. A fitness app might bundle a 2GB quantized version of Llama-3.2-3B to offer personalized coaching without sending health data to the cloud.

Now, that logic is economically broken.

There is little incentive to include 2GB of weights in an app bundle when Apple Intelligence offers Gemini-level reasoning via a free system API. Asking a customer to download a massive model creates a friction point that “sovereign AI” cannot overcome against a pre-installed default.

This creates a self-reinforcing cycle. Because Gemini is the default, apps are built around Gemini’s specific quirks and prompt structures. As more apps rely on Gemini, Google’s lock-in deepens. The “open” models are pushed to the fringes, used only by privacy absolutists, while the mass market consolidates around the Apple-Google axis. It effectively effectively kills the commercial viability of a decentralized AI ecosystem on mobile.

The Privacy Theater

Apple’s primary defense of this deal is, as always, “Privacy.” The company claims that the integration utilizes “Private Cloud Compute” (PCC), ensuring that user data is anonymized before it touches Google’s servers.

This is a beautiful piece of rhetorical sleight-of-hand.

It is likely true that Google won’t see individual user prompts in cleartext; Apple’s brand depends on maintaining that illusion. However, the deal structure, a “cloud computing contract”, likely gives Google something far more valuable: the gradient of global intent.

Google doesn’t need to know that you specifically asked Siri to book a flight to Cabo. They just need to know that 40 million people asked for beach vacations on Tuesday morning. This aggregate “trend data” is the fuel that trains the next generation of models. By processing Apple’s AI workload, Google gets a real-time pulse on the entire planet’s economic and social intent.

It is a data laundering operation. Apple keeps its “Privacy” halo, and Google gets the signal. This feedback loop ensures that Gemini will always be slightly ahead of any competitor who lacks access to valid real-time user intent at this scale.

The Antitrust Paradox

The cruel irony is that the Department of Justice is currently suing Google for its search monopoly, specifically citing the $20 billion/year Google pays Apple to be the default search engine in Safari.

While the lawyers fight that battle, which looks increasingly like a historical reenactment, Apple and Google have simply moved the monopoly upstream.

Search is a legacy interface. The future is Agentic. By locking up the Agent market now, before it has even fully matured, these two companies are immunizing themselves against the very remedies the DOJ is seeking. If the court orders Google to stop paying for Safari defaults, it won’t matter. Google has already paid $5 billion to be the default brain.

Regulators in Brussels and Washington are preparing to fight a war over browser choice screens, unaware that the browser itself is becoming obsolete. The new operating system is the conversation, and that conversation is now owned by Mountain View and Cupertino.

Conclusion: The Garden Wall Just Got Higher

The industry is not entering an era of “AI Agents.” It is entering an era of “Apple/Google Agents.”

For the consumer, the short-term experience will be magical. Siri will finally work. It will understand context, schedule meetings, and answer complex questions with Gemini-level fluency. It will feel like the future promised in science fiction.

But the cost of that convenience is the death of the Open Web. Consumers are trading the messy, chaotic, competitive potential of open-source AI for a sanitized, duopolistic future where two boards of directors decide what computers allow people to think.

The Wintel era gave the world productivity, but it also gave a decade of stagnation and security nightmares. The Gemini-Apple era promises the same. The walled garden just got a roof.

Sources

🦋 Discussion on Bluesky

Discuss on Bluesky

Searching for posts...